← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/337/2015disposed off

Syed Anwar Ali v. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur

2015-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HON'BLE HLGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT

BILASPUR (C.G.i w.P. (C) No.

Kg?

of PETITIONER x$yed Anwar'

Ali, aged about 45 years, 5/0 Ahmed Ali, Bus Operafor', R/o'

C-18, Secfor-5, Devendr'a Nagar, Raipur' (C.G.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENT :/ Regional Transporf Authority, / RaipurDis'r'r. Raipur (6.6.) ,WRIT \\ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR w.P. (C) No.33'7 of 2015 PETITIONER Syed Anwar Ali

Versus

RESPONDENT Regional Transport Authority Shri Santosh Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S. Pillai, P.L. forthe State.

SINGLE BENCH :

HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

ORAL ORDER (26l02l2'01 5) Grievance of the petitioner is that he has moved an application before the respondent on 25/12/2014 for grant of permanent stage carriage'permit on the route Raipur to Baloda Bazar via Saragaon, Bhaisa, Palari with two return trip daily.

v (2) Learned counsel for the' petitioner would submit that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the said '

'

application expeditiously.

I zz"

(3) Learned State counselfwould submit that the application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided along with all pending applications for the concerned route, in accordance with law and on its own merits as expeditiously as possible.

(4) ln view of the fact that petitioner's application is pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner's application and all other applications pending before it for the concerned route, within reasonable time. (5) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and'the respondent-authorities shall decide the representation, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the Case.

Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge