← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4481/2018allowed

Akash Sagar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 4481 of 2018 Akash Sagar S/o Late Shiv Sagar Aged About 21 Years R/o- Near Ganesh Temple, Sweeper Mohalla, Amapara, P.S. Ajad Chowk, Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Supela, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State :

Ms. Smita Ghai, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

ORDER

16.07.2018 Heard.

1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.311 of 2017, registered at Police Station - Supela, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 5.1.2018 and has been falsely implicated in this case. No case is made out against the applicant on the basis of the material placed before the Court by the prosecution. On the date of incident, the prosecutrix was a

major girl and further, the applicant and the prosecutrix both are married. The prosecutrix has been examined before the trial Court and she has not supported the case of the prosecution. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant be enlarged on bail.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and the submissions made in this respect. 4.

Heard counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary. 5.

According to the prosecution case, the applicant abducted the minor prosecutrix and committed rape with her. Hence, this case. 6.

Perused the contents of the case-diary and also perused the certified copy of the deposition of the prosecutrix and her mother before the trial Court. According to the statement before the concerned Court during the trial, she has turned hostile and has not supported the case of the prosecution. Hence, looking to the development and change in the circumstances, I feel inclined to grant regular bail to the applicant. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

8.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed. In case any default is committed by the applicant/s in appearing

before the concerned trial Court, this order granting bail shall stand cancelled automatically.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nimmi