National Health Mission v. Ayush Medical Association

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 348 of 2020 (Arising out of order dated 13.08.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS Nos. 2539 of 2020 and 3107 of 2020) • National Health Mission Through Deputy Director, Third Floor, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Vyavsayik Parisar, Sector 27, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Pin 492015, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant

Versus

1.

Ayush Medical Association Through Member, Dr. Mahendra Kumar Sao (Central Council), Office New Sarkanda, Bandhwapara, Front of Maharana Pratap Bhawan, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 495006. 2.

State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare And Medical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

Union of India Through Secretary, Department of Health And Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.

---- Respondent WA No. 349 of 2020 • National Health Mission Through Deputy Director, Third Floor, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Vyavsayik Parisar, Sector 27, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Pin 492015, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant

Versus

1.

Bilaspur Homeopathic Chikitsak Sangh Through Dr. Sanjay Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Bhagwat Prasad Sahu, Aged About 28 Years, Joint Secretary, of The Bilaspur Homeopathic Chikitsak Sangh, Office House No. 14/451, Village Vidya Up Nagar L-3, Post Tarbahar, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2.

State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare And Medical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3.

Union of India Through Secretary Department of Health And Family Welfare Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.

---- Respondents For Appellant : Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 1 : Shri Vaibhav P. Shukla, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 2/State : Shri S. C. Verma, Advocate General with Shri Vikram Sharma, Deputy Government Advocate.

For Respondent No. 3/UOI : Shri Ramakant Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General.

Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board Per P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice 21.09.2020 1.

When the matter is taken up for consideration, Shri C. Jayank K. Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that in view of the subsequent developments after passing the verdict by the learned Single Judge, appropriate steps are being pursued so as to meet the need of the hour. Hence it is stated that these matters are not intended to be pressed and therefore, permission is sought for to withdraw these matters. 2.

Permission is granted. The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (P. R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Hem