High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2077/2020disposed off

Nitin Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-09-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2077 of 2020

1. Nitin Agrawal S/o Shri Vimal Chhabaria Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Urla, Abhanpur, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Rachna Agrawal W/o Shri Ramlakhan Agrawal Aged About 46 Years R/o Transport Nagar, Korba, Tehsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry Of Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Capital Complex, Nawa Raipur (Atal Nagar), Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Board Of Revenue Circuit Court Raipur, G.E. Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Collector Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Sub Divisional Officer Arang, Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Tehsildar Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Smt. Preeti Davada W/o Prakash Davada R/o Davada Associate, Pushpak Apartment, Infront Of Goverment School, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

8. Rishi Kumar S/o Shri Loknath Sakarkar R/o Behind House Of Prabhakar Rao Ambilkar, Telipara Nayapara Golbazar, Raipur., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

9. Smt. Panna Devi Chopda S/o Shri Shrichand Chopda R/o Through Dilip Jewellers, Sadar Bazar, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocate For State/Res. 1 & 3 to 6 :

Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA For Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29/09/2020

1. The limited relief that the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for appropriate direction to the respondent No.6 for appropriate correction in the revenue records so far as the petitioners land is concerned.

2. State counsel does not oppose the said request.

3. As prayed for by the counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner approach respondent No.5 by moving an appropriate application which the respondent No.5 shall duly process and mark it to the respondent No.6 for an early decision. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondent No.6 to take appropriate decision on the application moved by the petitioner for correction in the revenue records at the earliest preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit