Tekram v. Union Of India And ORS.

E HQN'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl NO.

( OF 2015 ITIONER / Tekram, son of Kartikram, aged about 4O years, resident of Village Vat Savitri Chowk, Dabhra, Police Station Dabhra, Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.).

VERSUS

Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs New Delhi State of Clil'iattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Mantralaya, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa (c.G.) District Registrar, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.)

C9 Deputy R'éEistrar, Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Scrutiny State Level Caste Committee, Ravi Shankar Shukla University Premises Raipur District , Raipur (C.G.) Tahsilda { i Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgr Champa (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE W '

'

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

mmmw 24.2.201 5:- When the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner.

No representation is made.

Even on 2nd call, none appears for the petitioner.

Shri NK Vy'as, ASG for respo ndent No1.

Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay' Deputy Govt. Advocate' for the State. In the circiimstanoes, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/lm Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Barve 'l$§%