← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/280/2017withdrawn

Chhotelal Sonkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-06-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 280 of 2017 • Chhotelal Sonkar, S/o Ramkishun, aged about 63 years, R/o Camp-2, Near Hanuman Mandir, Sharda Para, Sonkar Samaj, Bhilai, Civil and Revenue District Durg (C.G.).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs (Police), New Raipur, Civil and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.). 2.

Director General of Police, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G). 3.

Inspector General of Police, Range Durg, District Durg (C.G.). 4.

Superintendent of Police, Durg, Civil & Revenue District Durg (C.G.). 5.

District Magistrate, Durg, Civil and Revenue District Durg (C.G.). 6.

Station House Officer Police Station Chhawni, Bhilai, Civil and Revenue District Durg (C.G.).

7.

Mohd. Ashif, Partner/Owner in the Firm of Munthana Foods Pvt. Ltd., Registered Address of the Company 1 C, La Place, Opp.- Sarvoar Portico Hotel, Shahnajaf Road, Hazaratganj, Lukhnow-226001. 8.

Mohd. Farid, Partner/Owner in the Firm of Munthana Foods Pvt. Ltd., Registered Address of the Company 1 C, La Place, Opp.- Sarvoar Portico Hotel, Shahnajaf Road, Hazaratganj, Lukhnow- 22601. 9.

Mr. D. Basu Manager of the Firm of Munthana Foods Pvt. Ltd., Registered Address of the Company 1 C, La Place, Opp.- Sarvoar Portico Hotel, Shahnajaf Road, Hazaratganj, Lukhnow- 22601.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Gurudev I. Sharan, G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 24.06.2021

1. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that he may be granted permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with a liberty to recourse the remedy available to him as per the judgment passed by the Court in WPCR No. 09/2016.

2. Considering the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, permission is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the instant petition with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge amita