Sitaram Lahare v. Alok Chandravanshi And ORS.

> BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Contempt Case (C) No. 2-^ of 2015 APPLICANT ^ Sitaram Lahare son of Guharam Lahare, aged about 54 years, R/o.

^Appellant) Dadarkhurd, P.S.

Rampur, Tahsil Korba, Civil and Revenue District Korba (C.G.),

VERSUS

NON-APPLIANTS 1..

Alok Chandravanshi, Commissoner, Nagar Palik Nigam, Korba, District ^e'ontemnors) Korba (C.G.), 2.

J.P. Singh, Bhu-Abhilekh Nirikshak, Korba, DistricE Korba (C.G.), 3.

B.L.

Diksena, Revenue Inspector, Bhu Abhilekh Department, Korba, District Korba (C.G.), 4.

Resham Lal Sahu, Patwari, P.H.No.5, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.), 5.

B.S.

Markam, Tahsildar Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.), 6.

Reena Baba Saheb Kangale, Collector-Korba (C.G.), CQNTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT "^c OF COURTS ACT 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

IC--78 ^TSEI •<4i<<irtii, yTfly'iKS, Rrtwy .^j/^lS WR^T gw^..6»^..^(^<:5^./Ii^21 sn^rqsw (^cif^d^y) '^IW?pfNTni«.itfl'f^l^^fSl%R s'lag^RlR-li* ??aiw ^ifei sn^i ^siiansTi^i cWI 3)!^[9iWR> S.B: Hon'ble Shri Jlustice Samav K. Aarawal 16/06/2015 ?

'e Mr.

Raghvendra Pradhan, counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.

Prafull N.

Bharat, Additional Advocate General for the Stat^ On instruction prom Collector Korba, learned Ade!it.i.onal 7\.'iTr?ca't-e| General would submit that construction has aj-ready beeii'

'st^pped and no would be raised.

• further construction .-"~''

>ove,'

contempt petition ^ is In'

view of accordingly closed.

Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Tiwalri y