High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2111/2020disposed off

Chandrashekhar Singh v. Bilaspur Municipal Corporation

2020-09-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2111 of 2020 Chandrashekhar Singh S/o Ram Ji Rajput Aged About 25 Years Residing At Ward No. 03, Rajgharana Colony, Uslapur, Behind White House, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Power of Attorney on Behalf of Mr. Vishwajeet Bhowmik. ---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. Bilaspur Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner, Vikas Bhawan, Raipur Road, Nehru Chowk, Below Apex Bank 495001.

2. State of Chhattisgarh at the Instance of Civil Lines, Police Station District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Aman Saxena, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1 :

Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Sidharth Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 30.09.2020

1. The limited prayer that the petitioner has made in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the application for grant of NOC for sale of property, filed by the petitioner-tas an attorney holder on behalf of the owner namely Vishwajeet Bhowmick. The NOC is being sought for the property situated at C-06, Ist Floor, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Complex, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2. According to the petitioner, the said application is pending consideration before the respondent No.1 for well over 13 months by now.

3. At this juncture, the counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the application of the petitioner shall be considered on its own merits in accordance with law and an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. He however further submits that from the documents enclosed along with the writ petition there appears to be some objection raised by the Police

-2department in respect of the owner of the property against whom some some serious criminal cases are pending consideration.

4. Be that as it may, since there is an application moved by the petitioner as an attorney holder before the respondent No.1, the respondent No.1, in turn, is expected to take a decision on the same either allowing the application or rejecting the same in accordance with law. Let a decision be taken by the respondent No.1 in this regard within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder