High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2043/2020disposed off

Dipak Kumar Agrawal v. C S P D C L, (Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited)

2020-09-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2043 of 2020 Dipak Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Rajkumar Agrawal, Aged About 34 Years R/o Pathalgaon District Jashpur Through Power Of Attorney Mahavir Prasad Agrawal, S/o Late Rajkumar Agrawal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. C S P D C L, (Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited) Through Its Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Dangania, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Executive Engineer (O And M ) Division Pathalgaon, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Engineer Sub - Division Pathalgaon, C S P D C L, Pathalgaon District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjay Agrawal with Ms. Monika Singh, Advocates For Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 01/09/2020

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is the disconnection of the electricity supply to the shops belonging to the petitioner.

2. According to the petitioner there is no reason whatsoever assigned for disconnection of his supply and that there is also no dues or

arrears to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents, in spite of that electricity connection has been disconnected. According to the petitioner the disconnection was made on 30.07.2020.

3. That the present writ petition has been filed on 29.08.2020 i.e. almost after one month. In between there also does not seem to be any representation made by the petitioner to the respondent authorities either for restoring the electricity supply or for knowing as to why the supply has been disconnected.

4. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the petitioner to approach the respondent No.2 & 3 by way of a representation to be filed within a period of 10 days from today. Upon such representation being made, respondent No.2 & 3 shall consider the same and decide the representation in accordance with law. The authorities can also consider the request of the petitioner for grant of any temporary connection in accordance with the guidelines and regulations governing the field.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit