← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/702/2018disposed off

Pakhli v. Shri Dhananjay Dewangan

2018-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Contempt Case (C) No.702 of 2018

1. Pakhli, daughter of Somaru & Wife of Mangal Sai, aged about 48 years,

2. Peeluram, son of Pankuram, aged about 60 years,

3. Bhagat Ram, son of Late Mahadev, aged about 36 years,

4. Ramlal, son of Sukhdas, aged about 55 years,

5. Dhanpati, son of Samadhanu, aged about 28 years

6. Raghuram, son of Shri Mangru, aged about 40 years,

7. Dhansingh, son of Raghu, aged about 50 years

8. Sadhuram, son of Raghu, aged about 48 years,

9. Balkumar, son of Lakhmuram, aged about 23 yeas (Grandson of Budhu) 10.Laxman, son of Khuti, aged about 50 years

11. Piluram, son of Vijay Singh, aged about 60 years 12.Padam Singh, son of Mangru, aged about 48 years 13.Pintu, son of Chaitram, aged about 20 years 14.Shyamsunder, son of Shamnath, aged about 55 years. 15.Pankibai, widow of Lachhuram, aged about 55 years 16.Kamalsai, son of Mannuram, aged about 52 years, 17.Sundro, son of Murha, aged about 30 years All residents of Gram Panchayat Aamaguda, Block Development & Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Shri Dhananjay Dewangan, Collector, District Bastar (CG)

2. Shri N. Bijendra Kumar, Chairman-cum-Managing Director, National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Nagarnaar, Steel Plant, Nagarnaar, District Bastar ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Mr.B.P.Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 17/07/2018 Heard. Office objection is overruled.

1.

This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court's order dated 12.4.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1039 of 2018.

2.

After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to give one opportunity to the respondents/contemnors to ensure compliance of this Court's order dated 12.4.2018 passed by this Court. 3.

The petitioners may also make additional representation along with the copy of this order within ten days from today before the respondents and, in turn, the respondents shall ensure the compliance of this Court's order dated 12.4.2018 in its letter and spirit expeditiously. 4.

With the aforesaid direction, the contempt case stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-