Kartik Ram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2000 of 2020

1. Kartik Ram S/o Khedu Aged About 50 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o- VillageBagaijor, Patwari Halka No. 16, Police Station And Tahsil- Saraipali, DistrictMahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Mahasamund DistrictMahasamund, Chhattisgarh

2. Sub Divisional Magistrate Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

3. The Tahsildar, Saraipali District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

4. Sankirtan S/o Paltu Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Bagaijor, Patwari Halka No. 16, Police Station And Tahsil- Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Adv.

For State :

Mr. Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21/09/2020

1. The limited relief that the petitioner has claimed in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondent No. 3 in respect of the alleged complaint that the petitioner has made on 26.06.2020.

2. The grievance seems to be in respect of the action on the part of the respondent No. 4 illegally entering upon the petitioner's property and destroying his standing crops, which situates in Khasra No. 6/2 measuring, 0.14 Hectare.

3. Considering the limited nature of relief that the petitioner has sought for, this Court is of the opinion that, ends of justice would meet, if the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No. 3 to take into consideration the complaint of the petitioner and try to redress his grievance. In case, if the demand of the petitioner is outside the powers

of the respondent no 3. then suitable intimation be given to the petitioner accordingly.

4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition accordingly stands disposed of Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha