← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4420/2013non prosecution

Kanta Lilhare v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ANR.

2018-08-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

C P, '

M L

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILSPUR

Writnetitionlsmo "N99 /2o13 $§§E§m $$§E§§Z PETITIONER:

Kanta Lilhare, D/o Shri R.C.

Lilhare, aged about 31 years, R/o Village Kosmi, '

W'PO x IQ'

Post Kosmi, Tahsil+Civil and Revenue aNoV'WQD '3 District Balaghat (M.P. ) Presented by Shing7Q>yM¢4A Dated....

14> '

,Q

Versus

RESPONDENTS :1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Higher Education New Mantralaya , Mantralaya Raipuf (co) 2] Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission, Through its Chairman Shanker Nagar Road, Bhagat Singh Square, Raipur (C.G.) WRITa PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

l i r '

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet g'3 WPS No. 4420 of 2013 Kanta Lilhare -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh & Anr. 14.108.2018 Mr.

Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer, Mr. Afroz Khan, Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocates for the respective respondents. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called on the previous date of hearing.

Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In the light of there being no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge '

Q Ved