Naresh Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4169 of 2021
1. Naresh Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Chabi Lal Sahu Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Guard With Water Resources Electrical/ Mechanical Bhandar, Sub Division, Gangrel, R/o - Gangrel Colony, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Engineer- In - Chief Water Resources Department, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Executive Engineer Electrical/ Mechanical Heavy Plant Division, M.J.P Rudri Water Resources, Gangrel, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate For State :
Mr. Ishan Verma, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 11.08.2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer that of a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner seeking regularization in the services of the respondents.
2. According to the petitioner, he has been working with the respondents since April 1999, as such the petitioner has put in more than 22 years of service and therefore the authorities may consider regularizing the petitioner in accordance with circulars of the State Government dealing with the regularization.
3. To this limited prayer State counsel does not oppose. However, the State counsel submits that consideration of the claim of the petitioner would be strictly in accordance with the circulars governing the field.
4. Given the submissions on behalf of either side, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization in accordance with the policies and regulations governing the field of regularization under the respondents.
5. Let a decision be taken at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.
Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge J-