Puna Ram Verma v. Smt. Geeta Verma

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 356 of 2018

1. Puna Ram Verma S/o Ramdheen Verma, aged about 62 years

2. Smt. Sindhulata Verma W/o Poona Ram Verma, aged about 57 years (both are r/o Village Bharuwadih Khurd, Tehsil - Tilda, District- Raipur (CG) P.S. - Kharora District - Raipur) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Smt. Geeta Verma w/o Vishnu Prasad Verma, aged about 40 years, r/o Village Bharuwadih Khurd, Tehsil - Tilda, District - Raipur (CG) P.S. - Kharora District - Raipur

2. State of Chhattisgarh through P.S. Kharora Raipur, Tehsil - Tilda, District - Raipur (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Dr. Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Ashish Shukla, Dy. AG for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 10/07/2018

1. The present petition is against the order dated 07.10.2017 passed by JMFC, Raipur, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in respect of the same complaint or the allegation of 20.03.2016 earlier the complaint was filed, which was dismissed after investigation. He submits that suppressing the said fact another complaint of the same incident has been lodged, wherein the other Court of JMFC has issued summons.

2. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of this case as the petitioner can very well agitate his grievance before the revisional Court

of competent jurisdiction. Exercising power under Section 226 of the Constitution of India at this stage would be premature. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petition to avail the appropriate remedy before Sessions Court.

3. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu