Pradeep Kesra v. Heera Lal Ratre

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 621 of 2018

1. Rup Singh S/o Jangaluram, Aged About 47 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. Shrawan @ Awan Mandavi S/o Dukaluram, Aged About 46 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

3. Gyanendra Das S/o Jagdish Das, Aged About 53 Years, Working As Daily Wages, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

4. Mahesh Kumar S/o Gaindlal, Aged About 42 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

5. Santuram S/o Gadaram, Aged About 45 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Kanker, Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

6. Chetan Ram S/o Late Itwati Ram, Aged About 48 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

7. Lalan Kumar S/o Bhokluram, Aged About 47 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

8. Vishram Singh S/o Sagnuram, Aged About 52 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. J. Shriram, Posted As Divisional Forest Officer, Kanker Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

CONT No. 624 of 2018

1. Tarun Kumar S/o S. R. Sukdeve, Aged About 50 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Narayanpur Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. Kamleshwar Patel S/o Sahdev Ram, Aged About 44 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Narayanpur Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

3. Krishna Lal S/o Shivlal Dewangan, Aged About 50 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Narayanpur Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

4. Rajnipati W/o Raju Chimankar, Aged About 45 Years, Working As Daily Wager, Narayanpur Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. Ku. Styli Mandavi, posted as Divisional Forest Officer, Narayanpur Forest Division, District-North Bastar Kanker (C.G.). CONT No. 634 of 2018 Pradeep Kesra S/o S.R.Kesra, aged about 51 years, working as Daily Wager, Narayanpur Forest Division, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.). ---Petitioner

2. Ku. Styli Mandavi, posted as Divisional Forest Officer, Narayanpur Forest Division, District-North Bastar Kanker (C.G.). CONT No. 620 of 2018 Manharan Lal S/o Late Man Singh Yadav, aged about 55 years, working as Daily Wager, East Forest Division, Bhanupratappur, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.).

---Petitioner

2. B.S.Thakur, posted as Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Bhanupratappur, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.).

CONT No. 629 of 2018

1. Dhanesh Ram S/o Ramlal Uike, Aged About 48 Years, Working As Daily Wager, East Forest Division, Bhanupratappur, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. Massuram S/o Kaveram, Aged About 44 Years, Working As Daily Wager, East Forest Division, Bhanupratappur, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. B.S.Thakur, posted as Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Bhanupratappur, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.). For petitioners :

Shri Kapil Maini, Advocate.

For respondents :

Shri K.P.S.Gandhi, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 10/08/2018 1.

These Contempt Petition has been filed alleging willful non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in the different Writ Petitions whereby the direction was to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in the light of the circular dated 05/03/2008.

2.

The counsel for the respondents submits that, they are in the process of filing of reply and a copy of reply was shown to the Court as also the counsel for the petitioners, wherein the respondents after due consideration have rejected the case of the petitioners for grant of regularization alleging that the circular dated 05/03/2008 would not be applicable in the case of the petitioners.

3.

Since, the direction was for consideration and taking a decision and the respondents have taken a decision, this Court is of the opinion that the direction given by this Court stands fully complied. 4.

Reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge this order subsequently passed, by way of fresh proceedings, all the Contempt Petitions stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE