← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4257/2018dismissed

Yogendra Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4257 of 2018 • Yogendra Patel S/o Late Shri Kaliram Patel, Aged About 26 Years Occupation Service Posted As Peon At Pre Metric Boys Hostel Chhotedongar (Collector Rate), R/o Village Madmanar Mahimagawadi, P. S. Jhara, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner, Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe, Welfare Department Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector, Narayanpur, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Narayanpur, District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. K. Tripti Rao, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 02.07.2018

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition praying for a direction to the respondents to regularise his service from the date in which the similarly situated persons have been considered and also to pay arrears of the said amount.

3. The petitioner is a peon and has been posted at Pre Metric Boys

Hostel Chhotedonger, District - Narayanpur. He was appointed as daily wage employee (Collector Rate) on 04.06.2013.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner urged that he does not want to press any relief(s) except that he will file fresh representation before the respondent No.4, who should decide his representation.

5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed off with this direction that the petitioner may file fresh representation before the respondent No.4 within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order and respondent No.4 shall decide such representation within two months from the date of receipt of such representation, in accordance with law and procedure.

6. This is made clear that this Court has not touched the merits of the case.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE kishore