High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4243/2018disposed off

Smt. Bhavna Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4243 of 2018 Smt. Bhavna Kaushik W/o Late Santosh Kaushik, Aged About 43 Years R/o Gond Para, Subhash Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Directorate, Public Instruction, Through The Director, Public Instructions, Mantralaya, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Collector, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For State :

Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/07/2018

1. The limited grievance, which the petitioner has made is that inspite of the fact that the State Government vide their letter dated 07.06.2017 had ordered the respondent No.2 to place the file of the petitioner before the Collector concerned for a suitable decision, yet no action has been taken by the Collector or for that matter by the respondent No.2 further in the proceedings.

2. Taking into consideration the limited grievance which the petitioner has, let the respondent No.2 ensure that the record pertaining to the claim for compassionate appointment filed by the petitioner is forwarded to the office of Collector if it has not been done till now. Further in turn the Collector i.e. the respondent No.3 shall further

process and decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with clause 15(11) of the scheme for compassionate appointment framed by the State Government.

3. Let the entire exercise be concluded at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days.

4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to appraise the respondent No.2 so also the respondent No.3 so far as the order passed by this Court in this petition.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition stands allowed and disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved