Akash Rai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4097 of 2019 Akash Rai S/o Shri Arun Kumar Rai Aged About 29 Years R/o Vijay Nagar, Avanti Vihar Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mo.No. 9893518399, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Telibandha Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri Rahim Ubwani, Advocate For the State :

Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /06/2019

1. This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.311/2019 registered at Police Station Telibandha, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that complainant Akash Shrivastava is the resident of Raipur. Applicant deceived him that he will provide the service of Computer Operator at Agriculture College and obtained Rs. 7 Lacs from him. Hemant Yadav had given him Rs. 4 Lacs for the service of Driver in Agriculture College. Abhipriya Verma had given him Rs. 25 Lacs for the service of Assistant Labour Officer in Agriculture College. Applicant not provided job and cheated them.

4. Counsel for the applicant submits that he is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that applicant is in jail since 5th June 2019 therefore, he may be released on bail.

5. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.

6. Looking to the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the prima facie evidence available on record against the applicant, looking to the seriousness of the alleged offence, looking to the impact of granting bail to the applicant on society, the present bail application is rejected.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde