Biharilal Dansena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2161 of 2020

1. Biharilal Dansena S/o Late Jagatram, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Village Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Jagannath Prasad Dansena S/o Kunjram Dansena, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of Village Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. Chaitkunwar Dansena W/o Jagannath Dansena, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Village Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

4. Bedram Jaiswal S/o Santram Jaiswal, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Village Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Jogiram S/o Manglu, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Headquarter, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Deputy Regional Manager, SECL Sub Area Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

6. The commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 3 & 6 :

Mr. S. Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 01.10.2020

1. Heard on I.A. No.01 which is an application for impleadment of the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur as necessary party.

2. The same is not opposed by the State counsel.

3. Accordingly, I.A. No.01 stands allowed. Let necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day itself.

4. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners at this juncture may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division i.e. the respondent no.6 for ventilating their grievance. According to the petitioners, the compensation, for the land belonging to the petitioners which has been acquired, has not been properly quantified and therefore, they intend to approach the Commissioner for redressal of their grievance.

5. The prayer made by the petitioners is accepted.

6. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, reserving the right of the petitioners to approach the concerned Commissioner for ventilating their grievance by making a suitable representation. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai