Virendra Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2919 of 2013 • Virendra Pandey S/o Lt Shri Brij Bihari Pandey Aged About 50 Years R/o 31/666, New Shanti Nagar Colony, Post And PS Shanti Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur, C.G.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Thana Mandir Hasod, P.O. Mandir Hasod, District Raipur, C.G.

2. Commissioner, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur, Thana Civil Lines, P.O. Byron Bazar, District Raipur, C.G.

3. Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, C.G, Raipur Vivekanand Nagar, Thana Civil Lines, P.O. Byron Bazar, District Raipur, C.G.

4. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, Shanker Nagar Road, Post And Thana Shanker Nagar, Raipur, C.G.

5. Shri Ram Niwas Singh S/o Shri Ekbal Singh Aged About 53 Years Presently Posted As

Deputy Director, Department Of School Education, Raipur, C.G.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Swajit Singh, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Sarabh Dangi, Advcoate.

For State :- Mr. Sunil Otwani, Addl. A.G.

For Respondent No.4 :- Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/09/2021

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the instant writ petition.

2. Accepting the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner the instant writ petition is dismissed as having no instruction to learned counsel Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit