← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4382/2016allowed

Smt. Sangita Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-08-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4382 of 2016 Smt. Sangita Kaushik W/o Baburam Kaushik, R/o Maharana Pratap Chauk, P.S. Civil Line, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Wrongly Mentioned D/o Baburam Kaushik In Impugned Order) ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Torwa, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For applicant - Shri A.K. Yadav, Advocate.

For Respondent/State - Shri Anupam Dubey, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 10/08/2016 1.

The applicant has preferred this application for grant of bail as she is arrested in connection with Crime No.06/2013 registered in Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 471, 474 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. 2.

As per the prosecution case, the applicant alongwith other five accused had obtained an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs to provide job to brother of Amit Thakur as a ward boy.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant and the complainant has entered into compromise and there has been some dispute over the money and therefore false report has been lodged. He further referred to the agreement wherein it is stated that some amount of Rs.80,000/- was paid back to the complainant and affidavit has been sworn by Amit Thakur that he do not want to continue any proceeding against the applicant, therefore the applicant may be released on bail. 4.

Learned State counsel do not dispute the existence of agreement

and stated that agreement executed in between the complainant and husband of the applicant is on record dated 26/02/2013 wherein it is stated that he do not want to take any action against the applicant. 5.

Considering the facts of this case and the affidavit of Amit Thakur and since the complainant has stated that he do not want any action against the applicant, this court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on her furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of concerned trial court for her regular appearance before it as and when directed.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri