← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1842/2018disposed off

Sukhram Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1842 of 2018 Sukhram Rathore S/o Late Udayram Rathore Aged About 82 Years R/o Village- Sarkho, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa,chhattisgah., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nayar Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Through- Its Chairman, Vidyut Seva Bhavan, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Seva Bhavan, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

6. Chief Engineer (Raipur Region) Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Seva Bhavan, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

7. Superintendent Engineer (Civil) Division-Iii, 2500 Mega Watt, MadwaTendubhata Power Plant, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

8. Ramnarayan Rathore S/o Hariprasad Rathore R/o Tendubhata, TahsilJanjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

9. Hariprasad Rathore S/o Sukhram Rathore R/o Tendubhata, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

10.Prabudayal S/o Ramdhin Jaiswal R/o Tendubhata, Tahsil- Janjgir, DistrictJanjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board 09/07/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though petitioner's land was acquired by respondent No. 4 but in lieu employment to his grand son Ramnarayan Rathore was given on the basis of forged agreement dated 21.08.2012, against which the petitioner has made complaint but till date respondent No. 4 has not taken any decision on the said complaint.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

The complaint made by the petitioner was got inquired by respondent No. 4 on the direction of Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), District Janjgir Champa but no final decision has been taken by respondent No. 4. Therefore, the respondent No. 4 is directed to take action against the complaint made by the petitioner expeditiously. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka