High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4478/2018dismissed

Ku. Seema v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4478 of 2018 Ku. Seema D/o Neel Kumar Aged About 23 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Nagar Panchayat Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Balodabazar District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Bilaigarh District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Bilaigarh District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

5. Ku. Saraswati Netam D/o Late Panchram R/o Ward No. 9, Bilaigarh District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For State :

Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 10/07/2018

1. The order under challenge in the present writ petition is the order of appointment of respondent No.5 as an Anganbadi Karyakarta for ward No.8 of Nagar Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh dated 10.05.2018.

2. At the outset, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition for the simple reason that the order under challenge in the present writ petition could be assailed by way of an appeal before the Collector under the scheme of employment itself.

3. Given the facts that the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal under the scheme itself, the present writ petition at

this stage is held to be premature reserving the liberty of the petitioner to prefer an appeal within a period of two weeks from today. The appellate authority shall thereafter on receipt of the appeal shall consider and decide the same in accordance with rules ignoring the question of limitation, if any, and the appeal be decided as expeditiously as possible on merits preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the appeal.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands allowed and disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved