P.N.Khemka v. Union Of India And ORS.

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'TISGARH AT BILASPUR

C...- WRIT PETITION ($) No. WW'OF 2014 PETITIONER:

RN.

Khemka, son of Anant Ram Khemka, aged about years;

occupation Contractor, resident of old post office road Anuppur, police station 85 Tahsil Anuppur, District Anuppur (Madhya Pradesh)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1) Union of India through the Secretary, r' Ministry of Rail Rail Bhawan Block No 16 (92/ g.

N New Delhi , it?

\s» x The General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3) The Divisional Engineer (North), Bilaspur, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4) Assistant Finance Director (Complaint), Ministry of Railway, Railway Board (Block 16) New Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR D.B.:

HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE SHRI INDER SINGH UBOWEJA, J.

WRIT PET1TION (C) NO. 2262 OF 2014 PETITIONER P.N. Khemka

Versus

RESPONDENTS Union of India and Others jWRlT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA} Appearance:

Ms. Neha Verma, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Advocate for the Respondents.

ORDER

(16th January, 2015) PER NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CJ.

1.

Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that he has fried an affidavit today after serving copy on the other side that the admissible dues of the Petitioner have been paid.

2.

Let the copy of the affrdavit placed by Counsei for the Respondents be kept on record to be returned after the Ofhce places the original application on record.

3.

If the Petitioner has any further grievances with regard to the quantum, it may be pursued in accordance with law.

4The application is disposed with aforesaid observation. Sd/- < I.S.UBOWEJA SdlJudge Acting Chief Justice