← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2982/2017dismissed

Miss Aparna Ramteke v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-12-13Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2982 of 2017 Miss Aparna Ramteke D/o Devendra Kumar Ramteke, Aged About 18 Years R/o R E S Colony Theikabod Badepara-1 Kanker, Chhattisgarh, P.S. Kanker, District North Bastar, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Medical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, P.S. Abhanpur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Medical Education, Directorate, Medical Education, Raipur, Old Nurses Hospital, D.K.S. Bhawan Parisar P.S. Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chairman, Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College, Junwani Kachandur Kurud, Durg, P.S. Kurud, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : None.

For Respondent/State : Shri Prasoon Bhaduri, Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 13/12/2018 1.

None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is however present.

2.

Matter relates to grant of admission in the MBBS course for the year 2017 in what is known as Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College, Durg. 3.

The reason for the Petitioner to approach the Court was withdrawal of the caste certificate issued in her favour showing her belonging to Mahar caste, a Scheduled Tribe.

4.

It seems that the last date fixed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court for grant of admission to such courses. as it then was 31.08.2017, and there was a clear statement made before the Court on behalf of the Respondents on 19.03.2018 that there was no seat available for grant of admission. Even otherwise, the High Court has no power to give a direction for admission into MBBS course beyond the cut-off date fixed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court coupled with the fact that there were no vacancies existing even after the cut-off date.

5.

The Petitioner seems to have lost interest in the writ application. The same is dismissed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Amit