Ram Sushil Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 4397 OF 2018

1. Ram Sushil Pandey S/o S/o Shri Samaylal Pandey, Aged About 50 Years Occupation Secretary, Village Panchayat Tendua, R/o Village Ranaee, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Sub Engineer Janpad Panchayat Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

6. General Administration Committee, Jila Panchayat, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh, Through The Chief Executive Officer. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Ashok K. Shukla, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05.07.2018.

1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that against the order of suspension dated 01.06.2018, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the appellate authority on 11.06.2018 and the appeal is still pending consideration.

2.

Considering the relevant dates in the instant case it would reveal that it is less than a month's time that the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition and has not waited for a reasonable time period for the appellate authority to decide the appeal. 3.

Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to entertain this petition. However, the petition is disposed of

with a direction to the appellate authority to ensure that the appeal preferred by the petitioner is decided at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4.

It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to make available copy of this order before the appellate authorities. 5.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder