High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1865/2018disposed off

Gendram Dirhi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1865 of 2018 Gendram Dirhi S/o Jhumuk Lal, Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Tikripara, Gram Panchayat Matasgara, Tahsil - Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Revenue And Natural Disaster, New Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional Officer (R) Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Tahsildar, Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Revenue Inspector, Revenue Circle Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

6. Patwari, P.H.N. 25, Tahsil - Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

7. Smt. Hemlata Dehriya, At Present Posted As Tahsildar Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

8. Mukesh Kumar Verma, At Present Posted As Revenue Inspector, Revenue Circle Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

9. Ram Naresh Pagdi, At Present Posted As Patwari, P.H.N. 25, Tahsil - Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

10.Struhan Das S/o Mohan Das Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Kargikala, P.S. And Tahsil Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

11. Station House Officer, Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. F. S. Khare, Advocate.

For Respondents/ State :

Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

10/07/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Tahsildar and Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kota have demolished the boundary wall and temple of the petitioner without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and without authority of law for which the petitioner has made representation before the Collector on 23.10.2017 but it has not been considered and decided till date. 2.

Be that as it may, the Collector, Bilaspur is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka