← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2186/2020disposed off

Virendra Kumar Sen v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2186 of 2020

1. Virendra Kumar Sen S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh Sen Aged About 47 Years Caste-Nai, R/o Ward No. 06, In Front Of Awasthi Colony, Geedam, Civil And Revenue District -South Baster Dantewada Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District-Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director Directorate, Department Of Tribal Development, Indrawati Bhawan,new Raipur, Civil And Revenue District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Commissioner, Department Of Tribal Development, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District-Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. The Assistant Commissioner, Department Of Tribal Development, Sukama, Revenue District-Sukama And Civil District-Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

5. The Collector Sukama, Revenue District Sukama & Civil District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate For State :

Mr. Raghvendra Verma, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 01.10.2020

1. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a person who was given a work of hair cutting at the various Hostel's/Ashrams run by the respondents No. 2 to 4. However, in-spite of many years have been passed, the petitioner till date has not been paid monetary due that he was entitled for. The petitioner further submit that the respondents have till date never disputed the entitlement of the petitioner. The petitioner has been

approaching the authorities for a considerable period of time but with no effective response on the same.

2. Given the limited nature of grievance that the petitioner has raised, this Court is of the opinion that disposal of the writ petition at this juncture would meet ends of justice. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a fresh claim/representation before the respondents No. 2 to 5 and the respondents are directed to duly scrutinize the same. If the petitioner is found entitled for any payment, the same shall be cleared at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days positively from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3. The present writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Jyotijha