Prakash Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4769 of 2019
1. Prakash Sharma S/o Late Shri Krishna Kumar Sharma Aged About 43 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Bhatapara Nevra, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
2. Vijay Kumar Jatwar S/o Shri Banau Das Jatwar Aged About 39 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Jonki, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
3. Tameshwar Dayal Singh S/o Jagdish Singh Aged About 34 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. High School Dhanras, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
4. Smt. Rashmi Koshale W/o Shri Lalchand Koshale Aged About 31 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Khargahana, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
5. Dinesh Kumar Kurre S/o Shri Dashru Ram Kurre Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Nipani, Block Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh
6. Smt. Ramkunwar Komra W/o Shri Balsai Komra Aged About 45 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Benur, Block Narayanpur, (Bastar) District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bastar, District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh
5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate.
For State :
Mr. Arvind Dubey, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 03.07.2019
1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed
in the case referred to herein above, this petition also deserves to be allowed with a direction that the petitioners shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.
3. No order as to costs.
Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai