High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4704/2019disposed off

Khamhan Lal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-06-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy1 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4704 of 2019

1. Khamhan Lal Sahu S/o Khemlal Sahu Aged About 45 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Sonpairi, Tahsil Magarload, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

2. Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Balram Sahu Aged About 50 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Devgaon, Tahsil Magarload, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Manhanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, CG.

4. District Education Officer Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

5. Block Education Officer Block Magarload, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

6. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Magarload, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 28/06/2019

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder