← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4374/2021disposed off

Rajkumar Naidu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-08-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4374 of 2021 Rajkumar Naidu S/o Shri K. S. Naidu, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Flat No. A 601, Avenue -144, Near Medishine Hospital, New Rajendra Nagar, Amlidih, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Cooperatives, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, P. S. Rakhi, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vivekanand Complex, Shailendra Nagar, P. S. Civil Lines, Civil And Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Accountant General, Accountant General Office, Zero Point, Baloda Bazar Road, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ali Asgar, Advocate For Respondents 1 & 2 :

Mr. Kunal Das, P.L.

For Respondent no.3 :

Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 19.08.2021

1. The grievance of petitioner in the present writ petition seems to be the inaction on the part of the respondents in not releasing the post retiral dues payable to petitioner pertaining to his GPF and GIS amount.

2. According to petitioner, he stood retired from the Cooperative Department of the respondent State in the year 2017. Though the petitioner has been paid all other dues that he was entitled for, the respondents for no reason have retained GPF and GIS amount.

According to petitioner, there is no order passed by the respondent authorities which could entail withholding of the releasing of amount under GPF and GIS.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also referred to the correspondence made by the Additional Registrar to the Dy. Registrar to take appropriate steps for releasing the amount payable to the petitioner under GPF and GIS. The Additional Registrar vide its correspondence dated 02.06.2021 had directed the Dy. Registrar to settle the dues within 15 days. It is the contention of petitioner that in spite of more than 2 months having lapsed even till date the petitioner has not got any benefit under GPF and GIS.

4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3 submits that since there is no intimation and correspondence made by the Department to the respondent no.3 in respect of GPF and GIS, no such further instruction could be issued from the Office of respondent no.3.

5. Given the said submissions by the counsel for the parties, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondents 1 & 2 to ensure that the entire admissible dues under GPF and GIS payable to the petitioner be processed and released forthwith without any further delay unless the same has to be withheld for any of the statutory reasons governing the filed. Let the exercise be completed by the respondents 1 & 2 within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai