Raju Suryawanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.No.6368 of 2020 Raju Suryawanshi, S/o. Late Lala Suryawanshi, aged about 38 years, R/o Village - Piplabhar (Thithoratola), Police Station Pendra, District - Gaurela, Pendra Marwahi (CG) ---Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Arakshi Kendra, Khadgawa, District Koriya (CG) ---Non-Applicant For Applicant :
Mr.Gyan Prakash Shukla, Advocate For Non-applicant :
Mr.Ravi Bhagat, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 28/09/2020 1.
Proceedings of this matter have been taken-up through video conferencing.
2.
The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for release him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.180/2020, registered at Police StationKhadgawa, Distt.Koriya (CG), for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
3.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 4.700 kg. of ganja was recovered from possession of the present applicant and 1.900 kg. of ganja was recovered from co-accused Chand Kumar.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in crime in question. He would further submit that the applicant has been arrested on 19.7.2020 and the trial is likely to take time for its conclusion, as such, he is entitled to be released on regular bail.
5.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.
6.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
7.
Taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of offence, pre-trial detention of the applicant and quantity of ganja, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.
8.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.
9.
It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹ 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.
10.
It is made clear that if the applicant has already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bonds already furnished in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23.3.2020 in the matter of In Re : Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No.1/2020), he need not furnish bail bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if he has not furnished bail bonds earlier, then he will be required to furnish bail bonds.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-