Akhilesh Kumar Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 697 of 2016 • Akhilesh Kumar Soni S/o Late Shri Sugandh Prasad Soni, Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Lower Divisional Clerk, Office Of District- Education Officer, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh),......(Applicant).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, (Chhattisgarh).

2. Under Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).

3. Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

4. Collector Surguja, Collectorate, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh).

5. District Education Officer Surguja, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :

Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate For State :

Mr. Bhasker Payasi, Panel Lawyer --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 26/09/2016 Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed petition aggrieved by inaction of the respondents, whereby he was transferred showing on his own request.

In view of the aforesaid submission order dated 11.08.2016 passed in WPS No. 3675 of 2016 is hereby recalled and following is passed. 1.

"The ground of challenge against the transfer order is that even though the petitioner never made any application for transfer on his own request, impugned transfer order shows that he has been transferred on

his own request. The allegation made in the petition is serious.

2.

Respondent No.1/State, though a responsible officer, shall get inquiry made in the matter and appropriate decision be taken in the matter. It is expected that the inquiry shall be completed within 30 days. 3.

For a period of 30 days, petitioner shall not be disturbed from his present place of posting.

4.

With the said observation, the petition is disposed off."

MCC is accordingly disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra