High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1763/2017disposed off

Ashok Kumar Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-05-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1763 of 2017

1. Ashok Kumar Mishra, aged about 50 years, S/o Shri Raknivas, R/o Dipo Para, TehsilBijapur, District - Bijapur (C.G.)

2. Sushil Kumar Mishra, aged about 44 years, S/o Shri Raknivas, R/o Dipo Para, TeshilBijapur, Distict - Bijapur (C.G.)

3. Sunil Kumar Mishra, aged about 41 years, Shri Raknikvas, R/o Dipo Para, TehsilBijapur, District - Bijapur (C.G.)

4. Sangeeta Mishra, aged about 40 yeas, W/o Shri Santosh Mishra, R/o Dipo Para, Teshil - Bijapur, District Bijapur (C.G.) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Revenue and Diasaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Forest, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. Collector, District- Bijapur (C.G.)

4. Sub Divisional Officer, Bijapur, District Bijapur (C.G.)

5. Tehsildar Bijapur, District Bijapur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Dewangan, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Anand Dadariya, Deputy Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 16/05/2018

1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30.03.2017 passed by the Tahsildar, Bijapur, District Bijapur.

2. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to prefer appeal before the appellate authority under Section 44 (1) of the Land Revenue Code, 1959 (henceforth "Code,

1959"). In the eventuality of filing appeal before the appellate authority under Section 44(1) of the Code, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

5. The certified copy of the order dated 30.03.2017 be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after furnishing an attested photocopy thereof in order to enable the petitioner to file the appeal, if any.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-