Smt. Gayatri Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4592 of 2019 Smt. Gayatri Dewangan W/o Shri Hum Shankar Dewangan Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer ( Nagriya Nikay ), And Posted At Government Girls Higher Secondary School Daudi District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattsigarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Urban Administration Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Daudi, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. Sameer Behar, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 26/06/2019

1. The limited relief that the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider transferring the petitioner from her present place of posting to a place nearby Ambagarh Chowki, Under Nagar Panchayat, Ambagarh Chowki.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that she is working as a Lecturer under Nagar Panchayat Daundi in Sanskrit subject at Government Higher Secondary School, Daundi since September, 2013 onwards. According to the petitioner her husband is working as a Hostel

Superintendent at Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon. She further submits that she has already made application seeking transfer from Daundi to Ambagarh Chowki on which the officials at Ambagarh Chowki has no objection. Officers at the present place where the petitioner is working also do not have any objection if the petitioner is transferred from Daundi to Ambagarh Chowki.

3. Given the aforesaid factual matrix of the case as has been narrated by the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if respondent No. 2 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and try to redress the grievance in accordance with the rules, regulations and transfer policy governing the service conditions of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit