← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4461/2018disposed off

Gulab Singh Jayswal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4461 of 2018 Gulab Singh Jayswal, S/o Shri Tejram Jayswal, aged about 30 years, Presently working as Training Officer at Govt. ITI, Berla, District Bemetara (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Skill Development, Technical Education and Employment Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya, Raipur.

2. Director, Employment and Training, New Raipur (CG). ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Somkant Verma and Mr. Manoj Chouhan, Advocates For State : Ms. K. Tripti Rao, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 09.07.2018 Heard.

1.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the respondent No.2 to consider his case and pass appropriate order for confirmation of his service.

2.

The petitioner is working as Training Officer in Government I.T.I., Berla, District Bemetara. He was appointed in the year 2013. His probation period was of two years. After lapse of two year, he has not been confirmed in the service. Now, he has completed near about 5 years of service.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State are agreed that the issue involved in the present case is squarely covered in the order dated 01.05.2018 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.3447 of 2018.

4.

Looking to the submission of both the parties, facts and circumstances of the case, and aforesaid order, this writ petition is disposed of, with the direction that the petitioner may file representation within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order for his claim of confirmation in the service before respondent No.2 and respondent No.2, in turn, shall decide such representation, so received, within a further period of 3 months from the date of filing of such representation.

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE L/-