High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4549/2018allowed

Nand Kishor Kaul v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4549 of 2018 Nand Kishor Kaul S/o. Shri P.L. Kaul, Aged About 40 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Geedam, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh., District : Dantewada, Chhattirh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Employment And Training, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For the Petitioner :

Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate For the State :

Shri R.K. Gupta, Dy. Advocate General ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /07/2018

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider his case and pass appropriate order for confirmation in his service.

3. The petitioner is working as Training Officer in Government I.T.I. Geedam, District Dantewada. He was appointed in the year 2010. His probation period was of two years. After, lapse of two years he has not been confirmed. Now, he has completed near about 5 years of service.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State counsel are agreed that the issue involved in the present case is squarely covered

in the order dated 01.05.2018 passed in Writ Petition (S) No. 3447 of 2018, order dated 19.06.2018 in Writ Petition (S) No. 4050 of 2018 and order dated 02.07.2018 in Writ Petition (S) No.3539 of 2018.

5. Looking to the submissions of both the parties, facts and circumstances of the case, and aforesaid order, this writ petition is disposed of, with the direction that the petitioner may file fresh representation within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order for his claim of confirmation in the service before respondent No. 2 and respondent No.2, in turn, shall decide the representations, so received, within a period of 3 months from the date of filing of such representations.

6. This Court does not make any comment on merits of the case. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde