High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4513/2018allowed

Smt. Sunita Navrang v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4513 of 2018 Smt. Sunita Navrang W/o Shri Jirdhan Navrang Aged About 30 Years Posted As Hostel Superintendent, At Girls Education Compound, Bhoramdev Block Kawardha R/o Village Bodla, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

3. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Development Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

4. Pratima Kushare Presently Posted As Teacher Panchayat At Pre-Metric Adivasi Girls Hostel Regakhar District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For the Petitioner :

Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For the State/Res. No.1 to 3 :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /07/2018

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition to quash the order dated 15/06/2018 issued by the Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Kabirdham.

3. The petitioner initially appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher at Pre-Matric Girls Hostel, Bodla and thereafter respondent No. 3 Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Development directed the petitioner to work on the post of Hostel Superintendent in Girls Education Compound, Bhormdev, District Kabirdham.

4. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may file the representation before the respondent No.2. The instant writ petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No. 2 to decide her representation within stipulated time.

5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the submission advanced by the counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with this direction that the petitioner may file representation within 15 days from today and the respondent No. 2 shall decide such representation filed by the petitioner within 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law and procedure. It is made clear that this Court has not touched the merit of the case.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde