Jeevan Lal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP(C) No. 2332 of 2020

1. Jeevan Lal S/o Late Borra Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Singhra , Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

2. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Sakti , District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

3. The Tahsildar Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

4. The Station House Officer Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

5. The Revenue Inspector Malkharoda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

6. Laxmi Prasad S/o Shri Bhuruwa Lal Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Singhra, Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ,, ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For State :

Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09.10.2020

1. The limited grievance that the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents to conclude the execution proceedings that the petitioner has filed before the respondent No. 2, where the matter is pending for quite some time.

2. According to the petitioner, he has a judgment and decree in his favour dated 26.11.2011, which has since attained finality and there

is no appeal or any proceedings from the said judgment and decree before any Court of Law presently pending. Based upon the said judgment and decree, he has moved an application before the respondent No. 2 seeking possession of the land situated in Khasra Nos. 125/5, 149/5, 125/6, 149/6, 125/7 & 149/7 total measuring 1.48 acres.

3. Learned Additional A.G. submits that his application has already been processed by the respondent No. 2, who inturn has sought for the Assistance of the Police Authorities for the execution of the said order and the same shall be done at the earliest in accordance with law.

4. Given the said submission by the Counsel for the parities, this Court is of the view that there is no purpose in keeping the writ petition pending, ends of justice would meet, if the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No. 2 and 4 to take appropriate steps at the earliest in accordance with law preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha