Praveen Kumar Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4534 of 2018

1. Praveen Kumar Mishra S/o S/o Shri Surya Prakash Mishra, Aged About 34 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. Women I. T. I. Koni, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Banshi Lal Kashyap, S/o S/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. Women I. T. I. Koni, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.,

3. Ku. Kavita Dewangan D/o D/o Uttam Lal Dewangan Aged About 28 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I. T. I. Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.,

4. Yaksh Kumar Thakur, S/o S/o Shri Dayal Lal Thakur, Aged About 34 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I. T. I. Kawardha, District Kawardha District Chhattisgarh.,

5. Ashok Kumar Dewangan S/o S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Dewangan, Aged About 30 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I. T. I. Mana, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Employment And Training, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For the Petitioners :

Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate For the State :

Shri R.K. Gupta, Dy. Advocate General ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /07/2018

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the

respondent No. 2 to consider their case and pass appropriate order for confirmation in their service.

3. The petitioners are working as Training Officer in different Government I.T.I.s of different districts. They were appointed in the year 2013. Their probation period was of two years. After, lapse of two years they have not been confirmed. Now, they have completed near about 5 years of service.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned State counsel are agreed that the issue involved in the present case is squarely covered in the order dated 01.05.2018 passed in Writ Petition (S) No. 3447 of 2018, order dated 19.06.2018 in Writ Petition (S) No. 4050 of 2018 and order dated 02.07.2018 in Writ Petition (S) No.3539 of 2018.

5. Looking to the submissions of both the parties, facts and circumstances of the case, and aforesaid order, this writ petition is disposed of, with the direction that the petitioners may file fresh representations within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order for their claim of confirmation in the service before respondent No. 2 and respondent No.2, in turn, shall decide the representations, so received, within a period of 3 months from the date of filing of such representations.

6. This Court does not make any comment on merits of the case. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde