High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/112/2017dismissed

Smt. Rohni Rajak v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPCR No. 112 of 2017

1. Smt. Rohni Rajak, W/o. Shri Shankar Lal Rajak, Aged About 40 Years, Member Of District Panchayat, Korba, Area No. 5 Katghora Chhattisgarh

2. Shankar Lal, S/o Late Shri B. P. Rajak, Aged About 45 Years, President Kosgai Seva Sansthan Evam Gauseva Dham, Village Hunkra

3. Maa Kosgai Seva Sansthan Evam Gauseva Dham, through President, Shankar Lal, S/o. Late Shri B. P. Rajak, Aged About 45 Years, All are R/o. Village Hunkra, P. S. And Tahsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

3. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Katghora, Distirct Korba Chhattisgarh

6. The Tahsildar, Katghora, Distirct Korba Chhattisgarh

7. Police Station, Katghora, Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh

8. Virendra Bahadur Panchbhai, Presently Posted As Sub Divisional Officer, Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh

9. Amit Beck, Tahsildar, Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh,

10. Sandhya Namdev, Naib Tahsildar, Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh,- Respondents 19.03.2019 Mr. Rajat Agrawal, Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Aditya Shrama, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard.

It appears that the instant writ petition is filed by the persons who were not affected by any cause of action. Neither the resolution of the concerned Society nor any document on behalf of the petitioner is

placed on record to show that under a resolution the petitioners have been authorised to advance of the cause of registered society. If the registered society is aggrieved person then the society has to come forward along with resolution for redressal of its grievance. The petitioners in the capacity of private persons who claims to be interested persons in such back ground can advance cause through a PIL. Unless and until some personal cause is affected the petitioners cannot raise such grievance before this Court. The petition is not maintainable and is dismissed.

Sd/- ( Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Rao