High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3496/2021disposed off

Munnalal Chaudhary v. The State Of Chhattisgarh,

2021-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3496 of 2021 • Munnalal Chaudhary S/o Durga Prasad Chaudhary Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Rajpur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Balrampur Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramnujganj, Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub - Divisionl Officer (Revenue) District Balrampur - Ramnujganj, Chhattisgarh

4. The Tehsildar, District Balrampur - Ramnujganj, Chhattisgarh

5. The Halka Patwari, Patwari Halka No. 23, Village Pasta, District Balrampur - Ramnujganj, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Ms Shriya Mishra, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 31/08/20

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the certain revenue records they were made online and there is a difference in the off line and the online record, which is causing problem to the petitioner. He refers to the different documents and would submit that the off line and online records are required to be one and same but the same having not been done, it will create

complication as also confusion and the right of the petitioner would be affected. He would therefore, submit that the respondents No.2 to 5 may be directed to verify and correct the online record which should be at parity with the off line records.

3. Considering the prayer made, it is obvious that the online and off line records should be one and same. If there is any discrepancy, it may lead to great hardship to a particular land holder. Under the circumstances, respondents No.2 to 5 are directed to correct the online record which should be at parity with the off line record of the petitioner within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order after verification of the facts.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu