Pradumn Patel v. Puniram

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP227 No. 510 of 2019 Pradumn Patel S/o Manohar Lalaged, Aged about 28 years, Caste Patel, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Chaple, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Puniram S/o Rohini Kumar, aged about 40 years, Caste Patel, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Chaple, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ram Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 :

Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate For State :

Mr. Akash Pandey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07.08.2019

1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 24/04/2019 wherein learned Civil Judge Class II, Raigarh has rejected the plaint of the petitioner in exercise of jurisdiction conferred under Order 7 Rule 11 (b) of the CPC, which is admittedly appealable as a decree under Section 96 of the CPC. As such, this writ petition is not maintainable in law.

2. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to prefer an appeal in accordance with law.

3. Certified copy of this order be returned after furnishing attested copy thereof.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet