← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/3682/2015dismissed

Bhoklu Gond v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 3682 of 2015 1.

Bhoklu Gond, S/o. Amar Singh Gond, aged about 35 years 2.

Umashankar, S/o. Bisahu Gond, aged about 30 years Both are residence of Village Kutela, P.S.-Aarang, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (C.G.).

---- Applicants

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, through S.H.O. Police Chowki-Gidhpuri, Police Station Palari, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant For Applicants :

Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate For Non-applicant :

Shri Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer for the State.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 17/07/2015 Heard on admission.

(1) This is the second bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicants, who have been arrested on 30.05.2015 in connection with Crime No.162/2015 registered at Police Station Police Chowki-Gidhpuri, P.S. Palari, Distirct Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 3, 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. (2) The first bail application of the applicants was dismissed on

merits by order of this Court dated 25.06.2015 passed in M.Cr.C. No.2853/2015.

(3) Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case and the applicants are in jail since 30.05.2015; and the investigation has been completed and the charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, the applicants may be released on bail.

(4) On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

(5) After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the application after filing of the charge-sheet and perusal of the record, I do not find any new or good ground to entertain the second bail application, therefore, the second bail application is rejected. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Certified copy, as per rules.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-