Smt. Seema Trikha v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4702 of 2019 Smt. Seema Trikha W/o Shri Devtosh Datta, Aged About 50 Years Working As Lecturer, Shahid Avinash Sharma Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Joint Director, Treasury Account And Pension Bilaspur Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5. The Principal, Shahid Avinash Sharma Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Dhani Ram Patel, Advocate For State :
Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 28.06.2019
1. The issue involved in the present writ petition is grant of two annual increments to the petitioner on account of obtaining B.Ed.
qualification.
2. Learned Counsel for either side submit that the said issue is now no longer res integra and this petition is squarely covered by the decision passed by this Court in batch of writ petitions leading case of which being WPS No. 6927 of 2011, decided on 06.12.2013. Therefore, this petition may also be disposed of in the similar terms.
3. In the light of the submission made by the counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that since the issue involved is covered by the decision of this Court in WPS No. 6927 of 2011, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the present writ petition.
4. The present writ petition deserves to be and is hereby allowed in similar terms and it is directed that the petitioner shall be entitled for two annual increments on account of her passing B.Ed. Examination.
5. The writ petition is accordingly allowed and disposed off. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Bhola