← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4864/2018allowed

Raj Kumar Ajgale v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4864 of 2018 • Raj Kumar Ajgale S/o Shri Sursutiya Ajgale, Aged About 47 Years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Guturma, P.S. And Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Incharge Officer of Excise Circle, Excise Department, Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant For Applicant - Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State - Shri Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board 23-07-2018 1.

Heard on the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail. The applicant has been arrested on 25-06-2018 in connection with Crime No.15/2018 registered at P.S. Incharge Officer of Excise Circle, Excise Department, Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh for the offence under Section 34(1)(A), 34(2) and 59(A) of Excise Act. 2.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in jail since 25-06-2018. Hence, he may be released on bail.

3.

Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the application and submission. It is submitted that in total 30 bulk liter illicit liquor has been seized from the possession of the applicant. Also, there are 13 previous cases registered against the applicant, out of which the applicant has been prosecuted in four cases under the provisions of the Excise Act. Hence, he is not entitled for grant of bail.

-24.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary. 5.

Considered on the submissions made and the contents of the case diary. Though some previous cases have been reported against the applicant, but conviction or acquittal in those cases has not been reported, further, in the present matter, detention of the applicant till conclusion of the trial would not serve any purpose, hence, for these reasons, I feel inclined to grant regular bail to the applicant.

6.

Consequently, this application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, for his appearance as and when directed. 7.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Aadil