Maheshwer Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2296 of 2016 Maheshwer Dhruv S/o Tula Ram Dhruv, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Ghatkarra P. S. Panduka Tahsil Chura District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Gariyaband Collectorate Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

2. Superintendent Of Police, Gariyaband Office Of Superintendent Of Police Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

3. Tahsildar, Tahsil Chura, Tahsil Office Chura District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

4. Station Officer, Police Station Panduka Tahsil Chura, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Ghatkerra (Dihipara) Block Chura, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate For State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate S.B.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 12/04/2017 Heard.

1. As against the petitioner's allegation that the petitioner has been subjected to social boycott in the village, respondents have come out with report of various authorities that it is not a case of social boycott, but a dispute with regard to construction on a piece of land which the petitioner claims to be of his own. The other group is obstructing to such construction on the ground that the petitioner is raising construction on the Govt. land.

2. The petitioner, if so advised, may approach to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Commission of the State, if not already approached.

-23. In case there is any complaint made by the petitioner before the Commission, it would be open for the Commission to hold enquiry and make appropriate recommendation to the Government. Except this, no other order can be passed in this petition.

4. The petition is accordingly finally disposed off. Sd/-/-- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen