Aes Kumar Verma, v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal Appeal No. 686 of 2020 • Aes Kumar Verma, S/o Prahlad Verma, Aged 21 years, R/o House No. 184, Ram Nagar, Ward No. 9, Village & Thana Suhela, District Baloda BazarBhatapara (C.G.) ---- Appellant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through: SHO, Thana Suhela, District: Baloda Bazar (C.G.) ---- State/Respondent For Appellant : Mrs. Shital Soni & Shri Ramawtar Mishra, Advocates For Respondent/State :

Shri Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya, J Order on Board 16.12.2020

1. This appeal by the accused/appellant under Section 14A (2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is directed against the order dated 10.08.2020 passed by the Special Sessions Judge (Atrocities), District Balodabazar (C.G.) in Special Case POCSO No. 561/2020, refusing to allow his regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The appellant is in jail since 16.07.2020 in connection with Crime No. 119/2020 for the offence punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act; Section 3(2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 376 & 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station- Thana Suhela, District Baloda Bazar (C.G.).

2. Prosecutrix is connected through video conferencing from District Legal Services Committee, Baloda Bazar and she has objection to grant of bail to the appellant by this Court.

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal as and when occasion arises.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above.

Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge vatti