Arun Kumar Biswas v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.5991 of 2016 1.

Arun Kumar Biswas S/o Chitratan Vishvas, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Makadi, Thana Makadi, Tah Makadi, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh) 2.

Smt. Lalita Vatti, W/o Sarkaram, Aged About 47 Years Occupation Teacher Panchayat Varg 2, R/o Makadi, Tah & Thana Makadi, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh) 3.

Sukaluram Netam, S/o Shri Bodaram Netam, Aged About 42 Years Occupation Teacher Panchayat Verg 2, R/o Makadi, Thana Makadi, Tah Makadi, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh) 4.

Manguram Netam, S/o Shri Kunwarsingh, Aged About 41 Years Occupation Teacher Panchayat, Verg 2, R/o Village Makadi, Thana Makadi, Tah Makadi, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat, Gramin Vikas Avm Shram Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 2.

Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Chhattisgarh Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 3.

Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh) 4.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Makadi, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh) 5.

Collector, Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh) 6.

District Education Officer, Kondagaon, District Kondgaon, (Chhattisgarh) --- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For State : Shri Prasun Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board 03/11/2016 (1) Heard on admission.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are working as Teacher (Panchayat), neither they have been given Kramonnati nor they have been given Samayman Vetanman (time bound pay scale) and therefore, they may be permitted to file representation before the competent authority for redressal of their grievance. To this, counsel for the State has no objection.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. In the eventuality of making any representation by the petitioners highlighting their grievance, the same is expected to be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously in accordance with law. (5) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-