Sunita Dongre v. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP (S) 5971 of 2016
1. Sunita Dongre S/o Shri Vijay Dongre, Aged about 40 years, R/o Village Gatora, P.S. and Tahsil-Masturi,District Bilaspur
2. Gulshan Dongre S/o Shri Vijay Donre, aged about 20 years, R/o Village -Gatora, P.S. and Tahsil-Masturi,, District Bilaspur (CG) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1.
National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, Through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Post Office-Ujjawal Nagar, Sipat, P.S. Sipat, Tahsil-Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG) 495555 2.
Assistant General Manager, Human Resource Department, N.T.P.C. Ltd Sipat, Post Office-Ujjawal Nagar, P.S. Sipat Tahsil-Masturi, District-Bilaspur (CG) 495555 3.
National Thermal Power Corporation, through its Chief Managing Director, Scope Complex 7, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Dehli-110 003 4.
The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) 495001 5.
Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Tahsil-Masturi, DistrictBilaspur (CG) ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :
Mr.Avinash Singh, Advocate For Res.No.1 to 3 :
Mr.Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For State :
Mr.Dheeraj Wankhede, G.A.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 02/11/2016
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners land has been subjected to acquisition by the NTPC, but employment in lieu of the land acquired has not been provided to the petitioners. He would further submit
that the petitioners have made a representation, which has not been considered and decided by respondent No.1.
2. Be that as it may, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners regarding employment in accordance with law preferably within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with fresh representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K Agrawal) Judge B/-